Ketanji Brown Jackson says Supreme Court risks being seen as political after voting rights decision

AP
Published
Ketanji Brown Jackson says Supreme Court risks being seen as political after voting rights decision

The short version

  • I think that means it’s incumbent on us to do things, to act in ways, that shore up public confidence,” she said.
  • She said the court had “spawned chaos” amid a fierce nationwide redistricting battle.
  • Three of her conservative colleagues on the court forcefully disagreed, calling her criticism “baseless” and saying accusations of partisanship aren’t justified.
  • The alternative, they wrote, would have been to allow an election under a map found to be unconstitutional.
  • LINDSAY WHITEHURST Whitehurst covers the Supreme Court and legal affairs for The Associated Press.

The story

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson speaks to the 2025 Supreme Court Fellows Program, Feb. 13, 2025, at the Library of Congress in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, Pool, File)

2026-05-19T02:02:25Z

WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said Monday that the Supreme Court risks being seen as political in the wake of a major voting rights decision.

She spoke after writing a solo dissent from the court’s decision allowing Louisiana to move quickly to use new maps after the court’s conservative majority struck down a majority-Black district and weakened the Voting Rights Act.

“Public confidence is really all the judiciary has,” she said at a talk before the American Law Institute in Washington, D.C.

“Everyone believes the court system is outside the political sphere. I think that means it’s incumbent on us to do things, to act in ways, that shore up public confidence,” she said.

Polling has shown public trust in the Supreme Court at historic lows in recent years, and Chief Justice John Roberts has separately bemoaned a perception that the justices are “political actors,” calling it a misunderstanding.

Jackson has become a frequent dissenter on the Supreme Court, joining her liberal colleagues last month to oppose the 6-3 decision that hollowed out the Voting Rights Act and later writing for herself to protest an order allowing Louisiana to use new maps even though early primary voting had already begun. She said the court had “spawned chaos” amid a fierce nationwide redistricting battle.

Three of her conservative colleagues on the court forcefully disagreed, calling her criticism “baseless” and saying accusations of partisanship aren’t justified. The alternative, they wrote, would have been to allow an election under a map found to be unconstitutional.

LINDSAY WHITEHURST Whitehurst covers the Supreme Court and legal affairs for The Associated Press. She’s won multiple journalism awards in a career that’s spanned two decades. twitter mailto

Read the full story at APOriginal

Related Markets

All Markets
View full chart →
View Full Chart
View full chart →
View Full Chart

Market data may be delayed. Not financial advice.

How other outlets covered this

Compare all

Alto found this story at 13 outlets. Same event, different framing — compare the headlines.

How this story developed

Full timeline

Alto has tracked this across 25 days of coverage from 13 outlets.

Powered by Gab AI

The Story At A Glance

Reading this article now — analysis appears below

Reading the article

💡 AI analysis provides alternative perspectives on current events

Up next

Related coverage from across the outlets Alto indexes.

Questions Alto can answer

From this story — each link opens a live data page or a tool already filled in.

  1. What's the forecast for Washington?Forecast and severe alerts
  2. What does gas cost in Washington right now?Current statewide average
  3. Who represents Washington in Congress?House and Senate members
  4. What are Washington's voter ID rules?ID rules and deadlines
  5. What is $100 from 1990 worth today?CPI-adjusted dollars — result on the next page
  6. Where does $75,000 rank in Washington?Census percentile — national and state
  7. What federal tax bracket is $80,000 (single)?Marginal and effective rate on the next page

All toolsAll topicsSource directoryStory timelinesHeadline comparisonSearchMost read

From Gab Shop

Official merchandise. Every order funds free speech infrastructure.

Shop all products

Install Alto on your phone

Add Alto to your home screen for breaking news — no app store, no account.

  1. Step 1Open alto.gab.com in SafariMust be Safari — not Chrome or in-app browsers
  2. Step 2Tap the Share buttonSquare with an arrow, at the bottom of Safari
  3. Step 3Tap "More"If you don’t see Add to Home Screen yet
  4. Step 4Tap "Add to Home Screen"Scroll the share sheet if you need to
  5. Step 5Tap "Add"Alto appears on your home screen like any other app.
gab

Speak Freely

Join millions on the original and only true free speech social network.

What Makes Gab Different

We're not just another social network. We're a platform built on principles that matter.

Freedom of Speech & Reach

All First Amendment protected speech is welcome. No algorithmic throttling or shadow banning.

Family-Friendly Platform

We maintain a clean environment. Explicit adult content is strictly prohibited.

Western Nations Only

Third-world IPs are blocked. No scammers, no spam farms. Built for Western civilization.

Funded By Users

Our users are our investors and customers. You're not the product being sold.

Battle Tested

A decade of standing strong. Banned from app stores, banks—and still here.

American Owned & Operated

We reject foreign censorship demands. Built by Americans, for free people.

Support Alto & Gab

Alto is funded entirely by readers like you. Your donation helps us continue delivering curated news from a right-wing Christian Nationalist perspective, powered by Gab AI.