Ketanji Brown Jackson says Supreme Court risks being seen as political after voting rights decision
The short version
- I think that means it’s incumbent on us to do things, to act in ways, that shore up public confidence,” she said.
- She said the court had “spawned chaos” amid a fierce nationwide redistricting battle.
- Three of her conservative colleagues on the court forcefully disagreed, calling her criticism “baseless” and saying accusations of partisanship aren’t justified.
- The alternative, they wrote, would have been to allow an election under a map found to be unconstitutional.
- LINDSAY WHITEHURST Whitehurst covers the Supreme Court and legal affairs for The Associated Press.
The story
2026-05-19T02:02:25Z
WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said Monday that the Supreme Court risks being seen as political in the wake of a major voting rights decision.
She spoke after writing a solo dissent from the court’s decision allowing Louisiana to move quickly to use new maps after the court’s conservative majority struck down a majority-Black district and weakened the Voting Rights Act.
“Public confidence is really all the judiciary has,” she said at a talk before the American Law Institute in Washington, D.C.
“Everyone believes the court system is outside the political sphere. I think that means it’s incumbent on us to do things, to act in ways, that shore up public confidence,” she said.
Polling has shown public trust in the Supreme Court at historic lows in recent years, and Chief Justice John Roberts has separately bemoaned a perception that the justices are “political actors,” calling it a misunderstanding.
Jackson has become a frequent dissenter on the Supreme Court, joining her liberal colleagues last month to oppose the 6-3 decision that hollowed out the Voting Rights Act and later writing for herself to protest an order allowing Louisiana to use new maps even though early primary voting had already begun. She said the court had “spawned chaos” amid a fierce nationwide redistricting battle.
Three of her conservative colleagues on the court forcefully disagreed, calling her criticism “baseless” and saying accusations of partisanship aren’t justified. The alternative, they wrote, would have been to allow an election under a map found to be unconstitutional.
Related Markets
All MarketsMarket data may be delayed. Not financial advice.
How other outlets covered this
Compare allAlto found this story at 13 outlets. Same event, different framing — compare the headlines.
- The Guardian — WorldDarline Graham wins South Carolina GOP nomination to replace her late brother in US Senate – US politics live1 day ago
- Google News'Kafkaesque nightmare': Ketanji Brown Jackson's dark warning on mail-in ballots - USA Today2 days ago
- Fox NewsJackson rips into Supreme Court colleagues' 'serious legal error' on Trump mail-in voting order2 days ago
- ZeroHedgeSupreme Court Backs Trump's Mail-In Ballot Overhaul3 days ago
- The FederalistStudy: Ketanji Brown Jackson Speaks More Than Twice As Much As Any Of Her Fellow Justices13 days ago
- Resist the MainstreamJustice Jackson Swoops in to Drop Most Ironic Statement Imaginable on Michelle Obama’s Podcast27 days ago
- Washington ExaminerJustice Ketanji Brown Jackson took up more than 20% of Supreme Court’s questioning last termabout 2 months ago
- LA TimesChabria: Birthright citizenship ruling was a win for democracy — and a warning about erasing historyabout 2 months ago
How this story developed
Full timelineAlto has tracked this across 25 days of coverage from 13 outlets.
- First Thing: Supreme court threatens midterms mail-in voting as it backs Trump planThe Guardian — World
- Jackson rips into Supreme Court colleagues' 'serious legal error' on Trump mail-in voting orderFox News
- 'Kafkaesque nightmare': Ketanji Brown Jackson's dark warning on mail-in ballots - USA TodayGoogle News
Powered by Gab AI
The Story At A Glance
Reading this article now — analysis appears below
💡 AI analysis provides alternative perspectives on current events