Officers who defended Capitol from rioters sue to block payouts from $1.8B ‘anti-weaponization’ fund

AP
Published
Officers who defended Capitol from rioters sue to block payouts from $1.8B ‘anti-weaponization’ fund

The short version

  • background: #000; color: #fff; cursor: pointer; display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; gap: 10px; padding: 14px 22px; border-radius: 999px; font-family: inherit…
  • background: linear-gradient(to bottom, rgba(255,255,255,0), rgba(255,255,255,1)); } Read More (function () { var APRM_EMBED_ID = "ap-readmore-embed"; var APRM_MOBILE_MQ = "(max-width:…

The story

Rioters storm the West Front of the U.S. Capitol Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File)

2026-05-20T15:29:47Z

WASHINGTON (AP) — Two police officers who helped defend the U.S. Capitol from an attack by a mob of Trump supporters sued on Wednesday to block anyone — including Jan. 6, 2021, rioters — from receiving payouts from a new $1.776 billion settlement fund for people who claim to be victims of politically motivated prosecutions.

The officers’ attorneys filed the federal lawsuit a day after Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the fund’s creation during a congressional hearing. Blanche, a personal attorney for President Donald Trump before joining the Justice Department, wouldn’t rule out the possibility that rioters who assaulted police on Jan. 6 would be eligible for fund payouts.

The lawsuit claims the government’s “Anti-Weaponization Fund” is an illegal slush fund that Trump will use to “finance the insurrectionists and paramilitary groups that commit violence in his name.” It describes the fund’s creation as “the most brazen act of presidential corruption this century.”

More than 100 police officers were injured during the Capitol riot. Over 1,600 people were charged with Jan. 6-related crimes, but Trump used his pardon powers to erase all of those cases in a sweeping act of clemency last year.

The plaintiffs suing Trump over the fund are Metropolitan Police Department officer Daniel Hodges and former U.S. Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn, who is running in Maryland for a seat in Congress. Hodges and Dunn both testified before Congress about their harrowing experiences on Jan. 6. Videos captured a rioter ripping a mask off Hodges as he was pinned against a door during a fight for control of a tunnel entrance.

On Tuesday, members of Congress peppered Blanche with questions about the fund. He described it as “unusual” but not unprecedented. Blanche failed to acknowledge that Trump’s Justice Department has investigated and prosecuted some of the Republican president’s political enemies, including former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

The fund stems from a settlement of Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns. It’s designed to compensate those who believe they were mistreated by prior administrations’ Justice Department. Decisions on payouts will be made by a five-member commission appointed by the attorney general.

Blanche and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also are named as defendants in the officers’ lawsuit. Spokespeople for the Justice and Treasury departments didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on the suit.

One of the attorneys for the officers is Brendan Ballou, a former Justice Department prosecutor who handled Jan. 6 cases.

Read the full story at APOriginal

Related Markets

All Markets
View full chart →
View Full Chart
View full chart →
View Full Chart
View full chart →
View Full Chart

Market data may be delayed. Not financial advice.

How other outlets covered this

Compare all

Alto found this story at 6 outlets. Same event, different framing — compare the headlines.

How this story developed

Full timeline

Alto has tracked this across 3 days of coverage from 6 outlets.

Powered by Gab AI

The Story At A Glance

Open the full breakdown on gab.ai

  • • Two police officers sued to block the $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund, arguing it is an illegal slush fund.

  • • The lawsuit claims the fund could improperly reward Jan. 6 rioters who were previously pardoned by President Trump.

  • • The fund originated from a settlement involving Trump's lawsuit against the IRS regarding his tax returns.
Context
The fund was designed to compensate individuals claiming they were victims of political lawfare by prior administrations. This follows President Trump's sweeping pardons that cleared all Jan. 6 related criminal charges.

Christian Perspective
Justice requires that those who commit violence against law enforcement be held accountable rather than rewarded with taxpayer funds. Using public resources to potentially benefit insurrectionists violates the biblical principle of righteous judgment and order. True restoration comes through repentance, not through government-funded payouts to those who attacked the seat of government.

Implications
This conflict highlights the tension between restorative justice for political victims and the necessity of maintaining social order. If left unchecked, such funds could undermine the authority of the state and reward those who seek to disrupt the nation. Protecting the integrity of the law is essential for a stable, Christian-based society.

Broader Trends
This situation reflects the ongoing battle against the weaponization of the federal government by the administrative state. It demonstrates the intense polarization surrounding the Jan. 6 events and the legal efforts to redefine political prosecution. The struggle highlights the shift toward using massive financial settlements to settle political grievances.

Takeaway
America First principles demand that federal resources be used to protect the nation and its citizens, not to subsidize political chaos. We must support leaders who prioritize the rule of law and the protection of those who defend our institutions. True justice must never be replaced by a system of political patronage.

Want to join the conversation about this story?

Join our community at Gab.com

Alto is powered by

Gab AI

The one AI they can't control. Our exclusive AI model trained to uphold Christian values and traditional principles in every interaction.

Up next

Related coverage from across the outlets Alto indexes.

Questions Alto can answer

From this story — each link opens a live data page or a tool already filled in.

  1. What's the forecast for Washington?Forecast and severe alerts
  2. What does gas cost in Washington right now?Current statewide average
  3. Who represents Washington in Congress?House and Senate members
  4. What are Washington's voter ID rules?ID rules and deadlines
  5. What is $100 from 1990 worth today?CPI-adjusted dollars — result on the next page
  6. Where does $75,000 rank in Washington?Census percentile — national and state
  7. What federal tax bracket is $80,000 (single)?Marginal and effective rate on the next page

All toolsAll topicsSource directoryStory timelinesHeadline comparisonSearchMost read

From Gab Shop

Official merchandise. Every order funds free speech infrastructure.

Shop all products

Install Alto on your phone

Add Alto to your home screen for breaking news — no app store, no account.

  1. Step 1Open alto.gab.com in SafariMust be Safari — not Chrome or in-app browsers
  2. Step 2Tap the Share buttonSquare with an arrow, at the bottom of Safari
  3. Step 3Tap "More"If you don’t see Add to Home Screen yet
  4. Step 4Tap "Add to Home Screen"Scroll the share sheet if you need to
  5. Step 5Tap "Add"Alto appears on your home screen like any other app.
gab

Speak Freely

Join millions on the original and only true free speech social network.

What Makes Gab Different

We're not just another social network. We're a platform built on principles that matter.

Freedom of Speech & Reach

All First Amendment protected speech is welcome. No algorithmic throttling or shadow banning.

Family-Friendly Platform

We maintain a clean environment. Explicit adult content is strictly prohibited.

Western Nations Only

Third-world IPs are blocked. No scammers, no spam farms. Built for Western civilization.

Funded By Users

Our users are our investors and customers. You're not the product being sold.

Battle Tested

A decade of standing strong. Banned from app stores, banks—and still here.

American Owned & Operated

We reject foreign censorship demands. Built by Americans, for free people.

Support Alto & Gab

Alto is funded entirely by readers like you. Your donation helps us continue delivering curated news from a right-wing Christian Nationalist perspective, powered by Gab AI.