Officers who defended Capitol from rioters sue to block payouts from $1.8B ‘anti-weaponization’ fund
The short version
- background: #000; color: #fff; cursor: pointer; display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; gap: 10px; padding: 14px 22px; border-radius: 999px; font-family: inherit…
- background: linear-gradient(to bottom, rgba(255,255,255,0), rgba(255,255,255,1)); } Read More (function () { var APRM_EMBED_ID = "ap-readmore-embed"; var APRM_MOBILE_MQ = "(max-width:…
The story
2026-05-20T15:29:47Z
WASHINGTON (AP) — Two police officers who helped defend the U.S. Capitol from an attack by a mob of Trump supporters sued on Wednesday to block anyone — including Jan. 6, 2021, rioters — from receiving payouts from a new $1.776 billion settlement fund for people who claim to be victims of politically motivated prosecutions.
The officers’ attorneys filed the federal lawsuit a day after Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the fund’s creation during a congressional hearing. Blanche, a personal attorney for President Donald Trump before joining the Justice Department, wouldn’t rule out the possibility that rioters who assaulted police on Jan. 6 would be eligible for fund payouts.
The lawsuit claims the government’s “Anti-Weaponization Fund” is an illegal slush fund that Trump will use to “finance the insurrectionists and paramilitary groups that commit violence in his name.” It describes the fund’s creation as “the most brazen act of presidential corruption this century.”
More than 100 police officers were injured during the Capitol riot. Over 1,600 people were charged with Jan. 6-related crimes, but Trump used his pardon powers to erase all of those cases in a sweeping act of clemency last year.
The plaintiffs suing Trump over the fund are Metropolitan Police Department officer Daniel Hodges and former U.S. Capitol Police officer Harry Dunn, who is running in Maryland for a seat in Congress. Hodges and Dunn both testified before Congress about their harrowing experiences on Jan. 6. Videos captured a rioter ripping a mask off Hodges as he was pinned against a door during a fight for control of a tunnel entrance.
On Tuesday, members of Congress peppered Blanche with questions about the fund. He described it as “unusual” but not unprecedented. Blanche failed to acknowledge that Trump’s Justice Department has investigated and prosecuted some of the Republican president’s political enemies, including former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
The fund stems from a settlement of Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns. It’s designed to compensate those who believe they were mistreated by prior administrations’ Justice Department. Decisions on payouts will be made by a five-member commission appointed by the attorney general.
Blanche and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also are named as defendants in the officers’ lawsuit. Spokespeople for the Justice and Treasury departments didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on the suit.
One of the attorneys for the officers is Brendan Ballou, a former Justice Department prosecutor who handled Jan. 6 cases.
Related Markets
All MarketsMarket data may be delayed. Not financial advice.
How other outlets covered this
Compare allAlto found this story at 6 outlets. Same event, different framing — compare the headlines.
- APTrump dismisses idea that Iran betrays his ‘no new wars’ campaign message3 months ago
- Google NewsOfficers who defended Capitol from rioters sue to block payouts from fund - NPR3 months ago
- New York PostJan. 6 cops sue to block $1.776B ‘slush fund’ created in wake of Trump settlement with IRS3 months ago
- AxiosHow Trump's $1.8B "anti-weaponization" fund works3 months ago
- Washington ExaminerOfficers who defended Capitol on Jan. 6 sue DOJ over anti-weaponization fund3 months ago
- ABC News 2 officers who defended Capitol on Jan. 6 sue to stop Trump's Anti-Weaponization Fund3 months ago
How this story developed
Full timelineAlto has tracked this across 3 days of coverage from 6 outlets.
Powered by Gab AI
The Story At A Glance
Open the full breakdown on gab.ai
- • Two police officers sued to block the $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund, arguing it is an illegal slush fund.
- • The lawsuit claims the fund could improperly reward Jan. 6 rioters who were previously pardoned by President Trump.
- • The fund originated from a settlement involving Trump's lawsuit against the IRS regarding his tax returns.
The fund was designed to compensate individuals claiming they were victims of political lawfare by prior administrations. This follows President Trump's sweeping pardons that cleared all Jan. 6 related criminal charges.
Christian Perspective
Justice requires that those who commit violence against law enforcement be held accountable rather than rewarded with taxpayer funds. Using public resources to potentially benefit insurrectionists violates the biblical principle of righteous judgment and order. True restoration comes through repentance, not through government-funded payouts to those who attacked the seat of government.
Implications
This conflict highlights the tension between restorative justice for political victims and the necessity of maintaining social order. If left unchecked, such funds could undermine the authority of the state and reward those who seek to disrupt the nation. Protecting the integrity of the law is essential for a stable, Christian-based society.
Broader Trends
This situation reflects the ongoing battle against the weaponization of the federal government by the administrative state. It demonstrates the intense polarization surrounding the Jan. 6 events and the legal efforts to redefine political prosecution. The struggle highlights the shift toward using massive financial settlements to settle political grievances.
Takeaway
America First principles demand that federal resources be used to protect the nation and its citizens, not to subsidize political chaos. We must support leaders who prioritize the rule of law and the protection of those who defend our institutions. True justice must never be replaced by a system of political patronage.
Want to join the conversation about this story?
Join our community at Gab.com→
Gab AI
The one AI they can't control. Our exclusive AI model trained to uphold Christian values and traditional principles in every interaction.