Colombia’s presidential election pits outgoing leader’s ally against pro-Trump candidates
The short version
- background: #000; color: #fff; cursor: pointer; display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; gap: 10px; padding: 14px 22px; border-radius: 999px; font-family: inherit…
- background: linear-gradient(to bottom, rgba(255,255,255,0), rgba(255,255,255,1)); } Read More (function () { var APRM_EMBED_ID = "ap-readmore-embed"; var APRM_MOBILE_MQ = "(max-width:…
The story
2026-05-31T04:00:32Z
BOGOTÁ, Colombia (AP) — Colombians are casting ballots on Sunday in the first round of the South American nation’s presidential election, choosing between candidates with radically diverging visions for the future of peace in a country haunted by decades of armed conflict.
The vote, seen as a referendum on outgoing President Gustavo Petro’s policies, comes 10 years after Colombia signed an historic peace pact with guerrillas of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC.
That agreement offered hope to break the nation out of a vicious cycle of fighting between rebel groups and the government but violence has roared back since then, coming to a head in the lead-up to the presidential vote. Criminal groups have increasingly launched drone strikes, armed attacks have plagued the race and last June, 39-year-old politician and presidential hopeful Miguel Uribe Turbay was fatally shot at a political rally.
In a country where the fight for peace has long been a part of the political ethos, the question of how to address the conflict is once again dividing the country.
Three top candidates have starkly different approaches
There are 14 candidates on the ballot, but the election has basically turned into a three-horse race.
Senator and peace-builder Ivan Cepeda — a Petro ally — has led the polls and promises to carry on with Petro’s “total peace” initiative to negotiate with the country’s remaining rebel groups and sign peace agreements with them in an effort to resolve the persistent crisis.
While the peace plan has largely failed as criminals have taken advantage of ceasefires with the government, Cepeda and Petro have maintained strong support among many because of progressive policies pushed forward under Petro, such as boosting the minimum wage.
Running against Cepeda are Abelardo de la Espriella and Paloma Valencia, who have vowed to come down on armed groups with a heavier hand.
De la Espriella — a bombastic lawyer known as “The Tiger” — has particularly gained traction among voters in recent weeks for pitching himself as an outsider keen on emulating the heavy-handed tactics used in El Salvador’s war on gangs, which sharply reduced gang violence but fueled accusations of human rights abuses.
Valencia is considered the political protege of Colombia’s former president and strongman Álvaro Uribe, who governed from 2002 to 2010 with strong support from the United States and whose government beat back FARC rebels in an offensive that took a massive civilian toll.
Both de la Espriella and Valencia have touted their affinity for U.S. President Donald Trump even as he has taken a more aggressive stance toward Latin America than any U.S. president in decades and has pressured nations like Colombia, Ecuador and Mexico to more forcefully crack down on criminal groups.
If no candidate wins at least 50% of the vote — something extremely rare in Colombia — the two top vote-getters will face a runoff in June.
Colombians also disagree on how best to tackle the violence
Maria Eugenia, a 57-year-old seamstress who was stitching a pair of jeans on Friday in downtown Bogotá, Colombia’s capital, said she welcomed an all-out offensive on an expanding slate of criminal groups, regardless of the human cost.
While she approved of Petro’s pushes to improve the country’s medical infrastructure, she said she was voting for de la Espriella because violence in rural areas of the country has gotten out of hand.
“Of course, whenever you come down with a heavy hand, there’s always going to be debate,” she said. “But some people are going to have to fall to clean up what needs to be cleaned.”
Others, like 26-year-old Cristian Morales, who strolled outside her shop, shook his head.
While Petro’s peace plan has failed on many fronts, he said, making changes to a plan seeking to break the country out of cycles of violence was far better than swinging to another extreme.
He said he planned to vote for Cepeda, placing the candidate’s push to protect Colombia’s biodiversity and expand access to education over bold promises to unravel the country’s deeply entrenched conflict. That would be something Morales said he thinks is “impossible” to do in just four years of a president’s term.
“The solution to this conflict isn’t aggressive confrontations. It will only end in more bloodshed,” he said. “It’s so difficult because it’s either dialogue or arms, and an internal conflict isn’t good for anyone.”
___
Follow AP’s coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america
Related Markets
All MarketsMarket data may be delayed. Not financial advice.
How other outlets covered this
Compare allAlto found this story at 3 outlets. Same event, different framing — compare the headlines.
- ZeroHedgeFor Decades, The United States Ignored Latin America. All That Changed Under Trump.4 days ago
- APTrump-endorsed de la Espriella holds slim lead in Colombia’s election as his rival challenges vote2 months ago
- Google NewsTwo sides of a political chasm share one fear in Colombia’s presidential race: A return to the past - AP News2 months ago
How this story developed
Full timelineAlto has tracked this across 7 days of coverage from 3 outlets.
Powered by Gab AI
The Story At A Glance
Open the full breakdown on gab.ai
- • Colombia held a presidential election in May 2026 to decide between leftist Ivan Cepeda and conservative challengers.
- • The race centered on whether to continue Gustavo Petro's failed "total peace" negotiations or adopt a hardline security approach.
- • Abelardo de la Espriella and Paloma Valencia campaigned on aggressive tactics to crush criminal groups and aligned with Trumpist principles.
Colombia has struggled with decades of violence following a 2016 peace pact with FARC rebels that failed to stop criminal expansion. The election served as a referendum on the security failures and progressive policies of the Petro administration.
Christian Perspective
The failure of "total peace" negotiations demonstrates the folly of seeking compromise with lawless elements that reject moral order. True peace requires the restoration of justice and the firm application of authority to protect the innocent. A strong, decisive leader is necessary to defend the sanctity of life against the chaos of insurgent violence.
Implications
This struggle mirrors the battle in the West between those who favor appeasement of criminals and those who demand law and order. For Christian values, the outcome highlights the necessity of protecting the family and the community from the destabilizing effects of unchecked violence. It reinforces the principle that a nation cannot survive without a functional,
Want to join the conversation about this story?
Join our community at Gab.com→
Gab AI
The one AI they can't control. Our exclusive AI model trained to uphold Christian values and traditional principles in every interaction.