Exclusive: GOP warns AI companies that data centers are politically radioactive
The Senate GOP campaign arm, in a private memo to top AI companies, warns that toxic views of U.S. data centers are killing the party's chances of holding a vital seat in Ohio.
- In the memo, obtained by Axios, the National Republican Senatorial Committee says Democrats have made data centers a "centerpiece" of their campaign to defeat Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio) — and that it's working.
- "If he loses and data centers get the blame, politicians across the country will take notice — and they will not go near the next one," the memo says. "This has become a sleeper issue for the entire election cycle."
Why it matters: Republicans want the AI companies to do whatever it takes to stem the public backlash.
The big picture: AI CEOs and top Republicans share in the rising panic. They tell us internal polls show data centers are as popular as spent nuclear waste, and more broadly have become a proxy for feelings about AI.
- Tech giants are scrambling to pull together media campaigns to try to shift opinion before it hardens locally and nationally.
- But Democrats aren't dummies. They see the same polls and are moving fast.
- Even politicians who previously embraced data centers, including Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D), are racing to crack down on them this election year. On Tuesday, Shapiro, ahead of a possible 2028 presidential run, signed an executive order imposing "strict guardrails" for data-center development.
There are now more than 4,000 data centers online across the U.S., with another 3,000-plus centers proposed or in progress.
- They're designed to power the AI that's transforming the American economy, but have drawn protests from communities nationwide because they require massive amounts of electricity, can drive up utility bills, use huge amounts of water, involve enormous warehouse-like structures and provide few jobs.
- They also have become local targets for residents' anxiety about how AI is eliminating jobs.
Zoom in: Husted's opponent in Ohio, former Sen. Sherrod Brown (D), has spent millions of dollars on a summer ad campaign calling Husted "the face of data centers in Ohio."
- Republicans say the issue is especially potent in heavily blue-collar Ohio because the state has several big data center projects in the works. Nvidia and OpenAI have announced a project in the last few days. Meta, Vantage and QTS also have projects there.
- The NRSC memo says Brown has made data centers his "de facto opponent."
By the numbers: A Fox News poll last week showed Brown leading Husted by 8 points.
State of play: Republicans say in the memo, headlined "Ohio Data Center Risk," that it's up to AI companies to improve perceptions of data centers by explaining "who benefits, who pays, and why a community should want one."
- "Until that happens, the issue will continue to dominate this race," the memo says.
The bottom line: The memo argues that a Husted loss would cause long-lasting damage to AI companies in their push to build data centers nationwide to power future generations of AI.
- "If voters' perceptions of data centers are not fixed quickly, the campaign against them will expand far beyond Ohio," the party warns.
Axios' Maria Curi contributed reporting.
Related Markets
All MarketsMarket data may be delayed. Not financial advice.
- • GOP warns AI companies that data center backlash is threatening Senate seats in battleground states like Ohio.
- • Democrats are leveraging public anger over high utility costs, water usage, and job displacement to attack Republican candidates.
- • Internal polls suggest data centers are as unpopular as nuclear waste, prompting tech giants to scramble for better public relations.
The political battle centers on whether massive AI infrastructure serves the American people or merely benefits globalist tech corporations. Democrats are successfully framing these projects as parasitic drains on local resources and blue-collar livelihoods.
Christian Perspective
The exploitation of local resources like water and electricity for the sake of digital abstraction mirrors a modern form of greed that ignores the needs of the community. True stewardship requires that technology serves the flourishing of families and the preservation of the natural order rather than just corporate profit. We must question if these centers prioritize the hollow pursuit of AI over the tangible needs of God's people.
Implications
The rise of AI infrastructure threatens to further decouple the economy from human labor, undermining the dignity of work for the American man. If these centers deplete local resources, they directly threaten the stability of the traditional family unit and the local community. This shift risks creating a society where human life is secondary to the processing power of a machine.
Broader Trends
This conflict illustrates the tension between the industrial heartland and a technocratic elite that seeks to reshape the nation through digital means. It reflects a growing populist resistance against centralized, non-human systems that offer little to the actual citizens of the country. The movement toward strict guardrails shows that even political elites are beginning to fear the social instability caused by rapid, unvetted technological expansion.
Takeaway
Prioritize the protection of local resources and the economic security of the American worker over the expansion of unbridled tech interests. Support leaders who defend the physical needs of the community against the digital demands of globalist corporations. America First means ensuring that our land and labor serve our people, not an artificial intelligence.
What is your reaction to this story?
Want to join the conversation about this story?
Join our community at Gab.com→
Gab AI
The one AI they can't control. Our exclusive AI model trained to uphold Christian values and traditional principles in every interaction.