Scoop: Mike Rogers-AIPAC rupture roils Michigan Senate race

Axios
Published
1
1
Read the full story at AxiosOriginal

Allies of Mike Rogers, Michigan's GOP nominee for the U.S. Senate, have asked AIPAC not to advertise on his behalf, triggering a rupture with the powerful but polarizing pro-Israel group.

  • Rogers spoke with AIPAC chair Michael Tuchin in Los Angeles last week. The next day, AIPAC shelved an already-cut video ad targeting Rogers' Democratic rival, outspoken Israel critic Abdul El-Sayed.

Why it matters: The extraordinary tension underscores how far AIPAC's political standing has fallen amid voters' anger over the war in Gaza. Even Rogers — a staunchly pro-Israel Republican — fears the group's public support could be a liability in the Nov. 3 election.


Driving the news: The move by Rogers' team angered AIPAC officials, who had spent more than $30 million to try to defeat El-Sayed in the Democratic primary and prepared to spend millions more to help elect Rogers, according to people familiar with the conversations.

Zoom out: El-Sayed made AIPAC a centerpiece of his successful primary campaign, using the group's spending against him to portray Democratic opponent Haley Stevens as beholden to the pro-Israel lobby.

  • El-Sayed has called Israel a "rogue state," accused it of genocide and apartheid, and has declined to say whether Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state.
  • That made defeating him a priority for AIPAC, which rarely mounts major spending campaigns in general elections.

Behind the scenes: Rogers' team warned AIPAC before the Aug. 4 Democratic primary that it believed El-Sayed would beat Stevens, though AIPAC held out hope Stevens would prevail. The two sides agreed to keep talking.

  • After El-Sayed narrowly won, AIPAC told Rogers' allies it wanted to continue its advertising offensive into the Nov. 3 general election.
  • But Rogers' team believed AIPAC's primary ads had backfired by giving El-Sayed a powerful foil — one he was eager to use again.
  • "AIPAC, if you're listening, come back and burn it again," El-Sayed said before his primary victory.

Rogers' allies urged AIPAC to get involved without putting the group's name front and center, people familiar with the talks told Axios.

  • One option: Directing AIPAC donors to a pro-Rogers super PAC instead of the group running its own ads, or a joint fundraising group the Rogers campaign has established with the national GOP.
  • Rogers' team also proposed hiring AIPAC's political strategists to help guide its effort.
  • But AIPAC officials weren't satisfied: The group wanted a visible role in defeating El-Sayed and argued that because Rogers is strongly pro-Israel, El-Sayed would tie him to the pro-Israel lobbying group regardless.

State of play: Direct talks between Rogers' team and AIPAC have now gone cold, prompting a broader GOP effort to broker peace. Jewish Republican donors with ties to both sides are acting as intermediaries, people familiar with the discussions said.

  • Some national Republicans now worry that AIPAC — whose super PAC ended July with nearly $60 million in the bank — will sit out the general election entirely.
  • Others say AIPAC has too much at stake to not jump into the Michigan race, and they expect the group to eventually reconcile with Rogers' team.

The big picture: AIPAC has suffered a string of high-profile defeats in Democratic primaries. The group's latest setback was Tuesday, when a candidate it opposed won a special election for a Northern California House seat.

  • Rogers is running in a swing state with one of the country's largest Arab American populations, giving him reason to tread carefully on Israel and Gaza.
  • A recent Fox News poll found 55% of Michigan voters oppose continued U.S. aid to Israel.

Reality check: El-Sayed's attacks on AIPAC may have less potency in the November general election than they did in the Democratic primary, where voters were more likely to be critical of Israel.

  • Operatives from both parties believe the Michigan race — like others in manufacturing-heavy states — is more likely to turn on voters' perceptions of the economy than their views on Israel.

What they're saying: "I welcome any and all support from the pro-Israel community and I'm proud to have their involvement," Rogers told Axios.

  • AIPAC representatives didn't respond to requests for comment.

Related Markets

All Markets

Market data may be delayed. Not financial advice.

Reader Reactions

Have a take on this story? Discuss it on Gab — no account needed to read, free to join to post.

Discuss on Gab

Want a second read? Ask Gab AI to analyze this story — private, no account needed to start.

Ask Gab AI
The Story At A Glance
  • • Mike Rogers' campaign is resisting visible advertising from AIPAC to avoid political backlash in Michigan.

  • • AIPAC seeks a high-profile role after spending millions to defeat Abdul El-Sayed in the primary.

  • • The dispute highlights growing voter opposition to U.S. aid for Israel.
Context
AIPAC has faced significant setbacks in recent primaries, losing ground to candidates who leverage anti-Israel sentiment. The Michigan race is particularly volatile due to a large Arab American population and high levels of skepticism regarding foreign aid.

Christian Perspective
The conflict highlights the tension between prioritizing American interests and the influence of foreign lobby groups. From a Christian standpoint, the destruction of life in Gaza is a horrific reality that complicates any political alliance with the state of Israel. True leadership must prioritize the sanctity of life and the welfare of the American people over special interest agendas.

Implications
The inability of the GOP to manage this rupture suggests that foreign interests continue to disrupt domestic political stability. This instability undermines the ability of leaders to focus on the economic and social needs of the American citizenry. It reflects a shift where even staunchly pro-Israel Republicans must weigh the cost of foreign allegiance against national popularity.

Broader Trends
This situation illustrates the declining power of traditional interest groups to dictate American foreign policy through campaign spending. It also demonstrates the growing divide between the America First movement and the established political establishment. The rise of anti-establishment candidates shows that voters are increasingly rejecting the influence of non-nationalist lobbies.

Takeaway
Americans must demand that their representatives prioritize the nation's blood and heritage over the demands of foreign entities. Political candidates should seek independence from special interest groups that prioritize foreign conflicts over domestic prosperity. A true America First agenda requires placing the needs of the American people above all else.

What is your reaction to this story?

Reader Reactions

Want to join the conversation about this story?

Join our community at Gab.com

Alto is powered by

Gab AI

The one AI they can't control. Our exclusive AI model trained to uphold Christian values and traditional principles in every interaction.

Support Alto & Gab

Alto is funded entirely by readers like you. Your donation helps us continue delivering curated news from a right-wing Christian Nationalist perspective, powered by Gab AI.

Gab Shop

Support free speech with official merchandise

View All Products

Install Alto on Your Phone

Add Alto to your home screen for quick access to breaking news — no app store required.

iPhone & iPad

Using Safari Browser

1

Open alto.gab.com in Safari

alto.gab.com
2

Tap the Share button

at the bottom of Safari
3

Tap "More"

More
4

Scroll and tap "Add to Home Screen"

Add to Home Screen

Tap "Add" to confirm

Alto will appear on your home screen like any other app!

Android

Using Chrome Browser

1

Open alto.gab.com in Chrome

alto.gab.com
2

Tap the menu button

three dots in top right
3

Tap "Add to Home screen"

Add to Home screen

Tap "Add" to confirm

Alto will appear on your home screen like any other app!
gab

Talk Big Tech Where Big Tech Can't Reach

AI, surveillance, and censorship, covered by the people the platforms removed first.

What Makes Gab Different

We're not just another social network. We're a platform built on principles that matter.

Freedom of Speech & Reach

All First Amendment protected speech is welcome. No algorithmic throttling or shadow banning.

Family-Friendly Platform

We maintain a clean environment. Explicit adult content is strictly prohibited.

Western Nations Only

Third-world IPs are blocked. No scammers, no spam farms. Built for Western civilization.

Funded By Users

Our users are our investors and customers. You're not the product being sold.

Battle Tested

A decade of standing strong. Banned from app stores, banks—and still here.

American Owned & Operated

We reject foreign censorship demands. Built by Americans, for free people.