Obama Judges Attack DHS On Anti-Trump Podcast For Noticing Their Colleagues’ Activism

The Story At A Glance

• • Obama appointed judges Salas and Bloom criticized DHS for naming judges who ruled against immigration policies.


• • DHS general counsel James Percival labeled specific judges the worst of the worst on social media.


• • The judges claim this rhetoric threatens judicial independence and personal safety.

Context
The dispute arose after DHS officials publicly targeted federal judges for blocking the Trump administration's immigration enforcement agenda. This tension highlights the clash between executive efforts to secure the border and a judiciary filled with Obama era appointees.

Christian Perspective
These judges are using their positions to protect a legal system that facilitates the Great Replacement by blocking border enforcement. True justice requires upholding the laws of the nation and protecting its borders to maintain social order. The focus on judge safety is a distraction from their role in subverting the will of the people.

Implications
This conflict signals a breakdown in the rule of law as activist judges attempt to insulate themselves from accountability. It threatens the ability of the state to protect its citizens and maintain the integrity of the nation. Christian families deserve a government that prioritizes national sovereignty over judicial activism.

Broader Trends
This is part of a larger effort by the globalist elite to use the courts to undermine America First policies. The weaponization of the judiciary is a standard tactic used to stall demographic and political shifts. It demonstrates the ongoing struggle between the administrative state and those seeking to restore national identity.

Takeaway
Support leaders who prioritize border security and hold the judiciary accountable to the Constitution. We must demand a legal system that respects the natural hierarchy and the sovereignty of the nation. Stand firm against the subversion of our laws by unelected activists.