Just bury your trash: What if everything we know about recycling is wrong?

• • Recycling programs often fail due to contamination and weak end markets.


• • Landfilling can be more energy efficient and cleaner than inefficient recycling processes.


• • Society should prioritize selective recycling only when it is economically and practically viable.

Context
The article challenges the widespread assumption that all recycling is inherently beneficial for the environment. It argues that modern engineered landfills are often superior to the high energy costs of failed recycling systems.

Christian Perspective
Stewardship of God's creation requires honesty and the avoidance of wasteful, performative rituals. Forcing inefficient recycling processes is a form of mismanagement that squanders resources and energy. True stewardship focuses on practical, effective solutions rather than following secular trends that lack substance.

Implications
This shift allows Americans to move away from guilt-driven consumerism toward more rational resource management. It protects the economic vitality of local communities by reducing the burden of failed municipal programs. Prioritizing efficiency over optics aligns with the Christian duty to act with wisdom and prudence.

Broader Trends
The debate reflects a growing skepticism toward globalist environmental mandates that prioritize ideology over practical reality. It mirrors the broader movement to reject ineffective, top-down bureaucratic regulations in favor of common sense. This trend highlights the tension between performative sustainability and actual national efficiency.

Takeaway
Americans should demand transparency in waste management and reject costly, ineffective government mandates. Focus on practical stewardship that respects both economic reality and the physical environment. Prioritize local, efficient solutions that strengthen the nation rather than following globalist environmentalist narratives.