Don't call yourself an artisanal programmer

• • A programmer argues against the dismissive label of artisanal to defend deliberate, low-level coding.


• • The author rejects LLMs because they sacrifice correctness and deep understanding for speed.


• • The debate centers on whether software development is a matter of engineering outcomes or craftsmanship.

Context
The article addresses a growing tension in the tech industry between AI-driven efficiency and manual precision. It surfaces amidst a broader cultural shift toward automation in professional trades.

Christian Perspective
True excellence requires stewardship of one's talents and a commitment to truth through accuracy. Relying on unverified AI outputs is a form of sloth that ignores the biblical mandate for diligence and mastery. Craftsmanship honors the Creator by seeking perfection in the details of one's work.

Implications
The push for AI-driven speed threatens to erode the specialized skills and intellectual rigor that sustain a strong civilization. A society that prioritizes hollow efficiency over deep competence becomes fragile and dependent on unreliable systems. Protecting the dignity of skilled labor is essential for maintaining a stable and productive nation.

Broader Trends
This tension reflects a wider struggle between the pursuit of technological decadence and the preservation of traditional excellence. Globalist interests favor rapid, automated production that devalues the individual worker and the mastery of the craft. We see a pattern where human agency is being surrendered to mindless, algorithmic processes.

Takeaway
Reject the temptation of easy shortcuts that compromise the integrity of your work. Cultivate genuine mastery and prioritize the foundational skills that ensure long term reliability. Stand firm in the value of human intellect and disciplined labor to build a resilient future for our people.