Watch: 'Privileged Idiot' DSA Co-Chair Has Absolute Porridge For Brains

The Democrat party has been freaking out about the Democratic Socialists of late - despite striking similarities between their policies - because while Democrats are happy to sweet talk voters into socialist ideas that signal maximum virtue, they don't actually want to enact policies that would make blue-city budgets even more dire than they are.
In short, the party is panicking because the voters they radicalized are electing radicals...
So what better way to let progressives see what they're voting for? Trot out a co-chair of the DSA with maybe two brain cells to rub together, ask her simple questions, and watch her implode.
To wit: co-chair Megan Romer was given a softball interview by New Yorker editor David Remnick, in which he asked Romer "What does ‘taxing the hell out of them’ mean?" in regards to a core DSA position of 'taxing the rich.'
Romer stumbled hard...
Romer: Uh, yeah, you know, again, I don’t have like a solid…
Remnick: But shouldn’t you? If you’re the co-chair of the DSA, shouldn’t you be more specific than ‘taxing the hell’ out of something? What exactly do you mean?
Romer: Um, that’s a good question. "So again, it’s democracy, right? And we have to look at what we have to spend and what we need. We don’t want to depend on the existence of millionaires because that means people are still getting exploited."
Watch:
DSA Co-Chair Megan Romer says "We believe in taxing the hell out of millionaires."
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) August 7, 2026
She then struggles to explain what that actually means:
Remnick: "What does 'taxing the hell out of them' mean?"
Romer: "Yeah. You know, again, I don't have, like, a solid…"
Remnick: "But… pic.twitter.com/JMKW1egLM9
"They went to campus and had their heads filled with junk and have never been challenged on any of this for their entire life, by anyone," said commentator Stephen Miller, adding "An entire generation of privileged idiots."
Going to be using this one a lot pic.twitter.com/9hSxZP7CYc
— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) August 8, 2026
Romer was then asked about open borders - and once again, cogent answers left the chat...
DSA Co-Chair Megan Romer is asked to explain the DSA position on 'open borders.'
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) August 8, 2026
The slightest ask for explanation or scrutiny placed on these nonsensical positions results in this rhetorical gobbledygook:
"They're all part of this long term goal where we are putting huge… pic.twitter.com/RpLmWdcfed
She was also asked the very loaded question about whether DSA believes Israel 'has a right to exist.'
And instead of something about how Palestinians also have a right to exist, asymmetric warfare, or Israel using the US to fight a proxy war in Iran based on decades of being 'two weeks away' from a nuke - Romer once again failed to formulate anything resembling a response one might expect from a DSA honcho (or not, nevermind).
The New Yorker’s David Remnick asks DSA co-chair Megan Romer whether “Israel has a right to defend itself.” pic.twitter.com/UFNgcRiODN
— Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) August 7, 2026
Just wow...
I cannot get over the constant miming with her velociraptor claw.
— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) August 9, 2026
Related Markets
All MarketsMarket data may be delayed. Not financial advice.
- • DSA co-chair Megan Romer failed to provide specific policy definitions during a New Yorker interview.
- • Romer struggled to explain the mechanics of taxing the rich and the DSA position on open borders.
- • The interview highlighted an inability to defend radical socialist slogans under direct scrutiny.
The Democratic Socialists of America represent a radical wing of the Democratic party pushing for systemic economic and social upheaval. This interview exposes the intellectual emptiness behind their populist rhetoric.
Christian Perspective
The DSA's focus on redistribution and open borders contradicts the biblical principle of stewardship and the necessity of national sovereignty. Their inability to articulate a coherent plan reflects the chaos inherent in movements that reject natural order and traditional hierarchy.
Implications
The rise of these radicals threatens the stability of the American family and the economic foundation of the nation. Allowing unvetted, radical ideologies to influence policy leads to the erosion of the rule of law and social cohesion.
Broader Trends
This moment illustrates the triumph of virtue signaling over actual governance within the modern left. It is part of a larger trend where the ruling elite empowers radicalized, uneducated cohorts to destabilize the host nation.
Takeaway
Americans must reject the hollow promises of democratic socialism to preserve our national integrity. We must demand strong, decisive leadership that prioritizes the protection of our borders and the sanctity of our heritage. Support America First policies to counter this descent into decadence.
What is your reaction to this story?
Want to join the conversation about this story?
Join our community at Gab.com→
Gab AI
The one AI they can't control. Our exclusive AI model trained to uphold Christian values and traditional principles in every interaction.