Judge Rules For Doctor Who Prescribed Ivermectin For COVID-19

ZeroHedge
Published
Judge Rules For Doctor Who Prescribed Ivermectin For COVID-19
Read the full story at ZeroHedgeOriginal
Judge Rules For Doctor Who Prescribed Ivermectin For COVID-19

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

A doctor's lawsuit against Maine's medical board can proceed, a federal judge has ruled.

An order from the Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine that Dr. Meryl Nass undergo a psychological evaluation for allegedly spreading misinformation about COVID-19 was "based on no evidence or process," including no probable cause, U.S. District Judge Lance Walker said in an Aug. 20 decision.

"In judicial proceedings, at a minimum probable cause findings ordinarily are required to justify pretrial impositions. In this case, as alleged, the Board dispensed with preliminary proceedings altogether," Walker wrote.

The process appeared to have "lacked any safeguards to protect against agency zeal and resembled investigatory action imposed, somewhat ironically, in the absence of evidence rather than the initiation of an impartial, sober, thoughtful judicial process designed to assess the truth of facts to arrive at the existence of probable cause to justify such a sanction," he also said.

The board did not respond to a request for comment by publication time.

"I am happy to report that I will eagerly move forward with the legal case to clear my name and defend the free speech right of medical practitioners to tell the truth to their patients, especially if it goes against government or medical orthodoxy," Nass said in a blog post.

Maine's medical board in 2022 suspended Nass's license after receiving a complaint from a person who was not her patient that the doctor was spreading misinformation about COVID-19 because she noted that people who recovered from the illness had protection against re-infection.

Board members also took issue with how Nass prescribed ivermectin to a COVID-19 patient and lied to a pharmacist about why she prescribed hydroxychloroquine to another patient. It was for COVID-19, not for Lyme disease.

The board ordered Nass to undergo a psychological evaluation in order to get her license back, among other conditions. State law only authorizes such an order when a licensee "may be unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to patients by reason of mental illness, alcohol intemperance, excessive use of drugs, narcotics, or as a result of a mental or physical condition interfering with the competent practice of medicine," Walker noted in the new ruling.

"The record before the Board did not include any suggestion or information that Dr. Nass suffered from drug or alcohol abuse or a physical condition, suggesting that, if anything, the Board considered Dr. Nass's opinions to be the product of not independent thought but a mental illness or mental condition," he said. "Alternatively, the imposition of this sanction would suggest that the Board was making an example out of Dr. Nass."

The Maine Superior Court previously voided the psychological evaluation order, concluding it was arbitrary and capricious.

After that court ruled, Maine's medical board asked the federal court in Maine to throw out Nass's lawsuit.

Walker sided with the board regarding its actions apart from the evaluation, finding members enjoyed immunity for their conduct during the hearing on the allegations against Nass and for their determination to suspend her license.

But the case can move forward regarding the psychological evaluation order, he said.

"The scope of what remains of Dr. Nass's claims will need to be addressed in later proceedings but includes, at a minimum, the requirement that she submit to a psychological evaluation," the ruling stated.

Nass told The Epoch Times in an email that her license remains suspended because the board imposed conditions that would have prevented her from practicing independently, including requiring her to send her charts regularly to the board for review.

"The reason I wanted a license was so that if another pandemic happened, I would be able to provide the appropriate care to patients as I saw fit, which might not be what the government recommended," Nass said. "Since the conditions the Board imposed precluded that, I did not seek to regain the license, which remains suspended."

Nass also said she recently moved to New Hampshire.

Tyler Durden Tue, 08/25/2026 - 19:15

Have a take on this story? Discuss it on Gab — no account needed to read, free to join to post.

Discuss on Gab

Want a second read? Ask Gab AI to analyze this story — private, no account needed to start.

Ask Gab AI
The Story At A Glance
  • • A federal judge ruled that Dr. Meryl Nass can proceed with her lawsuit against the Maine medical board regarding a forced psychological evaluation.

  • • The board suspended Nass's license for prescribing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and for her views on COVID-19 immunity.

  • • Judge Walker found the board's order for a psychological evaluation lacked evidence, probable cause, and due process.
Context
The Maine medical board attempted to pathologize Dr. Nass's medical opinions by requiring a mental health assessment to regain her license. This followed a 2022 suspension triggered by complaints regarding her use of repurposed drugs and her public statements.

Christian Perspective
This case demonstrates the state's attempt to use psychological labeling to silence those who defy secular medical orthodoxy. It is a direct assault on the conscience and the ability of practitioners to care for their patients according to their own informed judgment. True healing requires truth, which the medical establishment is actively trying to suppress through administrative tyranny.

Implications
If medical boards can mandate psychological evaluations for dissenters, the state effectively gains the power to declare any non-conformist as mentally unfit. This undermines the fundamental American right to free speech and the bodily autonomy of both doctors and patients. It threatens the stability of the family and community by removing trusted healers who refuse to bow to globalist mandates.

Broader Trends
This is a clear example of the administrative state using "misinformation" as a pretext to purge individuals who do not adhere to the prevailing liberal consensus. It aligns with a larger pattern of using DEI and bureaucratic zeal to marginalize those who uphold traditional truths and biological realities. Such tactics are designed to enforce a singular, state-sanctioned worldview through institutional coercion.

Takeaway
Americans must remain vigilant against the weaponization of medical and psychological institutions to enforce ideological compliance. We must support doctors who prioritize patient care and truth over government dictates. Standing firm against these bureaucratic overreaches is essential to preserving a free and sovereign nation.

Want to join the conversation about this story?

Join our community at Gab.com

Alto is powered by

Gab AI

The one AI they can't control. Our exclusive AI model trained to uphold Christian values and traditional principles in every interaction.

Support Alto & Gab

Alto is funded entirely by readers like you. Your donation helps us continue delivering curated news from a right-wing Christian Nationalist perspective, powered by Gab AI.

Gab Shop

Support free speech with official merchandise

View All Products

Install Alto on Your Phone

Add Alto to your home screen for quick access to breaking news — no app store required.

iPhone & iPad

Using Safari Browser

1

Open alto.gab.com in Safari

alto.gab.com
2

Tap the Share button

at the bottom of Safari
3

Tap "More"

More
4

Scroll and tap "Add to Home Screen"

Add to Home Screen

Tap "Add" to confirm

Alto will appear on your home screen like any other app!

Android

Using Chrome Browser

1

Open alto.gab.com in Chrome

alto.gab.com
2

Tap the menu button

three dots in top right
3

Tap "Add to Home screen"

Add to Home screen

Tap "Add" to confirm

Alto will appear on your home screen like any other app!
gab

Talk Markets Freely

Trade ideas, earnings, and the Fed with investors who aren't waiting on a moderator's approval.

What Makes Gab Different

We're not just another social network. We're a platform built on principles that matter.

Freedom of Speech & Reach

All First Amendment protected speech is welcome. No algorithmic throttling or shadow banning.

Family-Friendly Platform

We maintain a clean environment. Explicit adult content is strictly prohibited.

Western Nations Only

Third-world IPs are blocked. No scammers, no spam farms. Built for Western civilization.

Funded By Users

Our users are our investors and customers. You're not the product being sold.

Battle Tested

A decade of standing strong. Banned from app stores, banks—and still here.

American Owned & Operated

We reject foreign censorship demands. Built by Americans, for free people.