Clyburn Calls For Packing The Court With "Baker's Dozen" To Flip Cases

ZeroHedge
Published
Clyburn Calls For Packing The Court With "Baker's Dozen" To Flip Cases

The short version

  • James Clyburn (D-SC) added his voice to expand the Supreme Court to a "baker's dozen," or thirteen members to allow Democrats to add justices who agree with him and Democratic…
  • In the meantime, as discussed earlier, court packing is being pushed as the new litmus test for any Democratic candidates.
  • Clyburn's "baker's dozen" is a telling description of an effort to bake in partisan views on a Court expanded to create an instant liberal majority.
  • In defending this hostile takeover of the Court, Clyburn bizarrely insisted that the failure to do so might lead to a return to antebellum conditions when blacks were being given…
  • When asked by host Kristen Welker whether he supports the call of former Vice President Kamala Harris to pack the Court, Clyburn responded: "Yes, I do.

The story

Clyburn Calls For Packing The Court With "Baker's Dozen" To Flip Cases

Authored by Jonathan Turley via Jonathan Turley,

On NBC's "Meet the Press," Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC) added his voice to expand the Supreme Court to a "baker's dozen," or thirteen members to allow Democrats to add justices who agree with him and Democratic members on how the law must be interpreted.

In the meantime, as discussed earlier, court packing is being pushed as the new litmus test for any Democratic candidates. Clyburn's "baker's dozen" is a telling description of an effort to bake in partisan views on a Court expanded to create an instant liberal majority. In defending this hostile takeover of the Court, Clyburn bizarrely insisted that the failure to do so might lead to a return to antebellum conditions when blacks were being given fewer rights than whites.

When asked by host Kristen Welker whether he supports the call of former Vice President Kamala Harris to pack the Court, Clyburn responded:

"Yes, I do. I think that we are in a position now that calls for some significant actions taken by the Congress and we ought to expand. Thirteen is a pretty good number. A baker's dozen would be a good number to have on the court. And I would hope we would get people on the Court who will follow the constitutional underpinnings of this great nation of ours."

Clyburn then made the sensational claim that, without taking over the Court, blacks could be returned to virtual slave conditions. He added:

"The 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments have been interpreted different ways over the years. And we had in the Warren Court an interpretation of those amendments that I thought would be set for the future of the country. We have now a Supreme Court that has decided to reverse course and take this country back, I say, to those rulings of Justice Taney that said that no black man has any rights that a white man must respect."

So, while recognizing that interpretations have evolved, Clyburn now demands a takeover of the Court because he disagrees with the current interpretations. It was fine when interpretations aligned with his views, but opposing viewpoints are intolerable and warrant packing the Court with reliable liberal votes. Other Democrats have demanded packing the Court to reverse immigration rulings.

The unhinged rhetoric reflects the importance of taking over the Court by Democrats who view the institution as a barrier to carrying out a radical agenda, including proposals that are considered unconstitutional. Liberal professors and pundits have identified a court takeover as essential to, as one law professor put it, guaranteeing that the Democrats never lose another national election. As former Attorney General Eric Holder and Democratic strategist James Carville have made clear, it is about power and guaranteeing its retention.

Of course, these figures know that it will take a great deal to get Americans to trash core institutions and values. Polls have long shown that a majority of citizens oppose efforts to pack the Court. FDR's infamous court-packing plan in the 1930s has been widely panned in history, but is now being used as a model by many Democrats to achieve short-term political goals.

In order to overcome this fealty to our constitutional system, citizens must be very angry or very afraid. That is why the rage rhetoric is increasing as we approach the midterm elections. In the last election, the prediction was the imminent end of democracy. Now it is the return to slavery conditions in the United States.

One can disagree with the Court without suggesting that these justices are effective racists or want to return the nation to pre-Civil War slavery conditions. The suggestion that the Court would return this country to the Dred Scott period from before the Civil War is deeply offensive to the conservative justices, including Justice Clarence Thomas, who is African American. It is an absurd suggestion and shows contempt not just for the Court but for Black voters.

Jonathan Turley is a law professor and the best-selling author of "Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution."

Tyler Durden Tue, 09/01/2026 - 15:40
Read the full story at ZeroHedgeOriginal

Related Markets

All Markets
View full chart →
View Full Chart
View full chart →
View Full Chart

Market data may be delayed. Not financial advice.

Powered by Gab AI

The Story At A Glance

Reading this article now — analysis appears below

Reading the article

💡 AI analysis provides alternative perspectives on current events

More to read

Recent stories from across the outlets Alto indexes.

Questions Alto can answer

From this story — each link opens a live data page or a tool already filled in.

  1. What is $100 from 1990 worth today?CPI-adjusted dollars — result on the next page
  2. Where does a $75,000 household income rank nationally?Census percentile — national and state
  3. What federal tax bracket is $80,000 (single)?Marginal and effective rate on the next page
  4. What's Alto covering on the Finance desk?Latest headlines on this beat
  5. What else is Alto tracking on Federal Reserve & Interest Rates?Topic hub with related coverage
  6. What else is Alto tracking on Inflation?Topic hub with related coverage

All toolsAll topicsSource directoryStory timelinesHeadline comparisonSearchMost read

From Gab Shop

Official merchandise. Every order funds free speech infrastructure.

Shop all products

Install Alto on your phone

Add Alto to your home screen for breaking news — no app store, no account.

  1. Step 1Open alto.gab.com in SafariMust be Safari — not Chrome or in-app browsers
  2. Step 2Tap the Share buttonSquare with an arrow, at the bottom of Safari
  3. Step 3Tap "More"If you don’t see Add to Home Screen yet
  4. Step 4Tap "Add to Home Screen"Scroll the share sheet if you need to
  5. Step 5Tap "Add"Alto appears on your home screen like any other app.
gab

Talk Markets Freely

Trade ideas, earnings, and the Fed with investors who aren't waiting on a moderator's approval.

What Makes Gab Different

We're not just another social network. We're a platform built on principles that matter.

Freedom of Speech & Reach

All First Amendment protected speech is welcome. No algorithmic throttling or shadow banning.

Family-Friendly Platform

We maintain a clean environment. Explicit adult content is strictly prohibited.

Western Nations Only

Third-world IPs are blocked. No scammers, no spam farms. Built for Western civilization.

Funded By Users

Our users are our investors and customers. You're not the product being sold.

Battle Tested

A decade of standing strong. Banned from app stores, banks—and still here.

American Owned & Operated

We reject foreign censorship demands. Built by Americans, for free people.

Support Alto & Gab

Alto is funded entirely by readers like you. Your donation helps us continue delivering curated news from a right-wing Christian Nationalist perspective, powered by Gab AI.