Judge bars immigration arrests at US courthouses in a setback for Trump
The short version
- background: #000; color: #fff; cursor: pointer; display: inline-flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center; gap: 10px; padding: 14px 22px; border-radius: 999px; font-family: inherit…
- background: linear-gradient(to bottom, rgba(255,255,255,0), rgba(255,255,255,1)); } Read More (function () { var APRM_EMBED_ID = "ap-readmore-embed"; var APRM_MOBILE_MQ = "(max-width:…
The story
2026-06-24T02:51:14Z
A judge on Tuesday barred the federal government from making arrests at immigration courts, ordering an end to a practice that took hold shortly after President Donald Trump took office last year.
The Trump administration’s reversal of long-standing policy against arrests at immigration court resulted “not from merely unreasoned decision-making but a complete lack of decision-making,” wrote U.S. District Judge Casey Pitts of San Francisco. Authorities failed to address the “chilling effect” of arrests on whether people attend court hearings.
“For 80 years, Congress has commanded federal agencies to think before they act,” wrote Pitts, referring to the Administrative Procedure Act, a 1946 law that requires federal agencies to justify its actions. That law, he wrote, “does not require an agency to make the choice that a reviewing court might deem preferable. But it demands that an agency at least provide sound reasons for following its chosen course.”
The ruling is the second setback for courthouse arrests since May when a federal judge in New York barred them at immigration courts. That order applied only in New York, while the latest decision invalidated the policy nationwide.
James Percival, the U.S. Homeland Security Department’s general counsel, criticized the ruling as an exercise in judicial overreach.
“When a judge sentences a defendant, the defendant is taken into custody. If an alien is ordered removed by an immigration judge, the same should happen. A district judge ordering otherwise is naked judicial activism in service of an anti-American, open borders agenda,” Percival wrote online.
After Trump took office, hearings across the country often ended with cases being dismissed by the government, setting the stage for plainclothes agents to make arrests in hallways in coordination with attorneys from the Department of Homeland Security.
Pitts, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, faulted the administration for carrying out the arrests and for holding people in nearby cells for longer than a prescribed 12-hour limit.
Related Markets
All MarketsMarket data may be delayed. Not financial advice.
How other outlets covered this
Compare allAlto found this story at 8 outlets. Same event, different framing — compare the headlines.
- ZeroHedgeJudge Strikes Down Trump-Era Courthouse Arrest Policy2 months ago
- Border ReportJudge bars immigration arrests at US courthouses in a setback for Trump2 months ago
- The Daily CallerBiden-Appointed Judge Blocks Key Part Of Trump’s Immigration Policy2 months ago
- Google NewsFederal judge blocks migrant arrests at immigration courts nationwide - The Hill2 months ago
- ABC News Judge bars immigration arrests at US courthouses in a setback for Trump2 months ago
- APJudge bars immigration arrests at US courthouses in a setback for Trump2 months ago
- Washington Examiner — ImmigrationBiden-appointed judge ripped after blocking ICE arrests at immigration courts2 months ago
- The Guardian — WorldFederal judge vacates Trump officials’ immigration courthouse arrest policies2 months ago
How this story developed
Full timelineAlto has tracked this across 4 days of coverage from 8 outlets.
- Federal judge vacates Trump officials’ immigration courthouse arrest policiesThe Guardian — World
- Federal judge blocks Trump policy that allows immigration court arrests - The GuardianGoogle News
- Biden-appointed judge ripped after blocking ICE arrests at immigration courtsWashington Examiner — Immigration
Powered by Gab AI
The Story At A Glance
Reading this article now — analysis appears below
💡 AI analysis provides alternative perspectives on current events