Off-grid data centers aren't the panacea that some AI firms hoped
The short version
- Why it matters: If giant projects stumble, trillions of dollars in AI investment and the industry's plans to rapidly expand data centers could be at risk.
- The big picture: In an effort to speed AI development, some companies are building data centers powered mainly by onsite generation rather than waiting years to connect to the electric grid. There…
- State of play: Recent hiccups are highlighting the challenges that come with bypassing the grid. Earlier this month, New Mexico's top land official rejected a gas pipeline meant to supply onsite…
- Catch up quick: Chief developers of this off-grid approach include OpenAI, and its partners Oracle and Crusoe, which have worked on OpenAI's Stargate campuses. A Stargate project in Abilene…
- What they're saying: Critics argue off-grid data centers could prove slower and more costly to deploy, less reliable to run, and more expensive than expanding the electric grid. "This is a flimsy way…
The story
Local backlash and reliability concerns are challenging the vision of an AI boom built quickly using large off-grid data centers.
Why it matters: If giant projects stumble, trillions of dollars in AI investment and the industry's plans to rapidly expand data centers could be at risk.
The big picture: In an effort to speed AI development, some companies are building data centers powered mainly by onsite generation rather than waiting years to connect to the electric grid.
- There are 59 data centers with a combined capacity of about 90 gigawatts that plan to build their own power "behind-the-meter" using sources like gas turbines, generators and fuel cells, according to a report from research firm Cleanview.
- A smaller subset is trying to run large campuses mostly on behind-the-meter power as a way to move more quickly than the local utility and the grid can.
- Infrastructure risk analysis firm Occam Edge tracks 12 projects where onsite power is the primary serving supply, representing about 10.6 GW of announced capacity.
State of play: Recent hiccups are highlighting the challenges that come with bypassing the grid.
- Earlier this month, New Mexico's top land official rejected a gas pipeline meant to supply onsite fuel cells for Oracle's 2.5 GW "Project Jupiter" data center campus, part of Oracle and OpenAI's Stargate initiative.
- The regulatory set back could contribute to a years-long delay.
- A week later, a much smaller off-grid data center in Virginia, saw its onsite gas turbines knocked offline for 24 hours, forcing it to run on dirty backup diesel generators during already bad air quality from the Canadian wildfires.
Local residents complained of burning lungs and 60-decibel level noise, and a supervisor called for new laws to regulate generators.
Catch up quick: Chief developers of this off-grid approach include OpenAI, and its partners Oracle and Crusoe, which have worked on OpenAI's Stargate campuses.
- A Stargate project in Abilene, developed by Crusoe, reportedly went offline for days at a time due to issues with power and cooling equipment.
- Another off-grid player is Elon Musk, who rattled the energy world when he built xAI's Colossus 1 using mobile gas turbines in just a few months. While it was initially off-grid, it's now grid-connected and selling compute to Anthropic.
- Despite a lawsuit from the NAACP over Colossus 1, Musk is now using gas turbines to power Colossus 2 (with compute sold to Google), and earlier this month bought a mobile gas turbine company.
What they're saying: Critics argue off-grid data centers could prove slower and more costly to deploy, less reliable to run, and more expensive than expanding the electric grid.
- "This is a flimsy way to deploy AI," says energy investor Jigar Shah, who predicts much of the bullish off-grid deployment figures won't materialize.
- Power engineers are worried that off-grid data centers won't meet reliability targets, says Occam Edge founder and CEO Christian Okoye, who compares "Dark Gigawatts" to the "Dark Fiber" of the dotcom bust.
- "It's a time of desperation," says Josh Wong, founder and CEO of ThinkLabs AI, which helps utilities find more capacity on their current grids. "The [off-grid] business model is bolt-on."
Follow the money: Investors are lacking insight into the reliability of off-grid data centers, says Okoye.
- Investors faced with the uncertainties of off-grid data centers could decide not to underwrite them.
- S&P Global Ratings recently downgraded Oracle's long-term issuer credit rating to BBB- from BBB, just one step above junk status, due to its massive data center spending, which includes investment in onsite power infrastructure.
- Trillions of dollars are riding on whether large off-grid data centers can work as advertised, justify their added cost and win local support.
What's next: More high-profile problems building and running off-grid data centers could lead to a reckoning that the AI boom will be a lot more grid-powered than many AI companies hoped.
Related Markets
All MarketsMarket data may be delayed. Not financial advice.
How other outlets covered this
Compare allAlto found this story at 2 outlets. Same event, different framing — compare the headlines.
Powered by Gab AI
The Story At A Glance
Open the full breakdown on gab.ai
- • AI firms are attempting to bypass the electric grid by building massive off-grid data centers using onsite gas turbines and fuel cells.
- • Regulatory hurdles, such as pipeline rejections in New Mexico, and local community backlash over noise and pollution are stalling these projects.
- • Financial instability is rising as credit agencies downgrade companies like Oracle due to the massive capital requirements and reliability risks of these ventures.
The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence requires unprecedented amounts of energy that existing utility grids cannot immediately provide. Companies are turning to "behind-the-meter" power generation to accelerate development and avoid years of interconnection delays.
Christian Perspective
The push for rapid AI development reflects a modern Tower of Babel, where human ambition seeks to bypass natural and social order for technological supremacy. Relying on unstable, makeshift power sources shows a lack of stewardship and a disregard for the stability required to build lasting infrastructure. We must prioritize truth and reliability over the deceptive promises of rapid, unvetted technological growth.
Implications
The failure of these projects could lead to massive economic instability and wasted resources that could otherwise serve the American people. As these tech giants struggle, the tension between corporate interests and local communities will intensify. This instability threatens the economic security of the nation and the stability of the communities these projects inhabit.
Broader Trends
The reliance on massive, centralized AI power projects mirrors the shift toward a globalist, technocratic control of information and energy. We see a pattern of elite-driven projects clashing with the rights and well-being of local citizens. This tension highlights the growing divide between the interests of multinational tech corporations and the sovereignty of the American people.
Takeaway
America First interests demand that our energy and technological infrastructure serve the nation's stability rather than the speculative whims of globalist tech firms. We must prioritize energy independence and reliable, domestic power sources that support our own citizens. True strength comes from building on a foundation of order and permanence, not through flimsy, high-risk technological shortcuts.
Want to join the conversation about this story?
Join our community at Gab.com→
Gab AI
The one AI they can't control. Our exclusive AI model trained to uphold Christian values and traditional principles in every interaction.