Fauci discussed COVID mRNA vaccine concerns for pregnant women in text chain released by Senate committee

Fox News
Published
Fauci discussed COVID mRNA vaccine concerns for pregnant women in text chain released by Senate committee

The short version

  • Anthony Fauci privately discussed concerns about COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for pregnant women in January 2021, including questions about fever after a second dose and a theoretical…
  • The exchange involved Fauci, then-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr.
  • Vivek Murthy, who would later become former President Joe Biden’s surgeon general.
  • Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Rand Paul, R-Ky.
  • Murthy initially asked whether there was any reason to favor vaccination earlier or later in pregnancy and whether officials had seen evidence of adverse outcomes among pregnant…
Read the full story at Fox NewsOriginal

Related Markets

All Markets
View full chart →
View Full Chart

Market data may be delayed. Not financial advice.

How other outlets covered this

Compare all

Alto found this story at 3 outlets. Same event, different framing — compare the headlines.

How this story developed

Full timeline

Alto has tracked this across 2 days of coverage from 3 outlets.

Powered by Gab AI

The Story At A Glance

Open the full breakdown on gab.ai

  • • Anthony Fauci's private texts reveal he acknowledged a lack of pregnancy specific trial data and potential links between vaccine induced fever and miscarriage.

  • • Federal officials were making public recommendations while privately discussing theoretical risks to unborn life.

  • • Senate Republicans released these messages as part of a larger investigation into the pandemic response.
Context
The COVID vaccine trials initially excluded pregnant women, leaving officials to rely on limited data when issuing mandates and recommendations. This discrepancy between private caution and public certainty is now being scrutinized by lawmakers.

Christian Perspective
The sanctity of life demands absolute caution when medical interventions involve pregnant women and their unborn children. Any attempt to downplay the theoretical risk of miscarriage is a failure to respect the divine gift of life. Protecting the mother and the child must always take precedence over state driven medical agendas.

Implications
This revelation undermines trust in the medical establishment and highlights the danger of government overreach in matters of bodily autonomy. It

Want to join the conversation about this story?

Join our community at Gab.com

Alto is powered by

Gab AI

The one AI they can't control. Our exclusive AI model trained to uphold Christian values and traditional principles in every interaction.

Source for this news story

Fox News

Fauci discussed COVID mRNA vaccine concerns for pregnant women in text chain released by Senate committee

Dr. Anthony Fauci privately discussed concerns about COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for pregnant women in January 2021, including questions about fever after a second dose and a theoretical risk of miscarriage during the first trimester, according to newly released text messages. The exchange involved Fauci, then-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky and Dr. Vivek Murthy, who would later become former President Joe Biden’s surgeon general. Fauci said, because many people experience significant cytokine-related symptoms and fever after a second dose, that reaction “theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester,” according to the messages shown on page two of documents released Monday by Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Rand Paul, R-Ky. Murthy initially asked whether there was any reason to favor vaccination earlier or later in pregnancy and whether officials had seen evidence of adverse outcomes among pregnant women who had already been vaccinated. Fauci responded that there were “no data or theoretical reason” to believe vaccination earlier in pregnancy should be preferred over later vaccination. He also said concerns that an mRNA vaccine could alter a person’s genes were a misconception. Later that evening, however, Fauci mentioned the evidence of issues with the second shot for pregnant women. Walensky replied that it was “definitely a good point, esp after dose two.” Murthy then wrote that he had been hearing concerns about mRNA causing mutations in a developing fetus and said Fauci’s point about a cytokine response after the second dose was “a really good point.” The following day, after Murthy flagged a World Health Organization recommendation at the time advising against use of Moderna’s vaccine in pregnant women because of limited data, Fauci emphasized that officials had to weigh the potential risks of vaccination against the risks posed by COVID-19 itself. He wrote that more than 10,000 pregnant women had already been vaccinated with “no issues” reported, that Food and Drug Administration, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidance allowed pregnant women to choose vaccination, and that animal toxicology studies had not raised red flags. Murthy responded that the WHO recommendation surprised him and warned that a strong recommendation against vaccination based on a lack of data could be “potentially quite damaging to public confidence among pregnant women.” Walensky agreed and said she would flag the issue for an upcoming ACIP meeting.

www.foxnews.com

Up next

Related coverage from across the outlets Alto indexes.

Questions Alto can answer

From this story — each link opens a live data page or a tool already filled in.

  1. What is $100 from 1990 worth today?CPI-adjusted dollars — result on the next page
  2. Where does a $75,000 household income rank nationally?Census percentile — national and state
  3. What's Alto covering on the World desk?Latest headlines on this beat
  4. What else is Alto tracking on Vaccine Mandates?Topic hub with related coverage

All toolsAll topicsSource directoryStory timelinesHeadline comparisonSearchMost read

From Gab Shop

Official merchandise. Every order funds free speech infrastructure.

Shop all products

Install Alto on your phone

Add Alto to your home screen for breaking news — no app store, no account.

  1. Step 1Open alto.gab.com in SafariMust be Safari — not Chrome or in-app browsers
  2. Step 2Tap the Share buttonSquare with an arrow, at the bottom of Safari
  3. Step 3Tap "More"If you don’t see Add to Home Screen yet
  4. Step 4Tap "Add to Home Screen"Scroll the share sheet if you need to
  5. Step 5Tap "Add"Alto appears on your home screen like any other app.
gab

Follow the World Unfiltered

Read what people in the story are actually saying, not what a foreign censorship request left behind.

What Makes Gab Different

We're not just another social network. We're a platform built on principles that matter.

Freedom of Speech & Reach

All First Amendment protected speech is welcome. No algorithmic throttling or shadow banning.

Family-Friendly Platform

We maintain a clean environment. Explicit adult content is strictly prohibited.

Western Nations Only

Third-world IPs are blocked. No scammers, no spam farms. Built for Western civilization.

Funded By Users

Our users are our investors and customers. You're not the product being sold.

Battle Tested

A decade of standing strong. Banned from app stores, banks—and still here.

American Owned & Operated

We reject foreign censorship demands. Built by Americans, for free people.

Support Alto & Gab

Alto is funded entirely by readers like you. Your donation helps us continue delivering curated news from a right-wing Christian Nationalist perspective, powered by Gab AI.