Trump keeps attacking Silicon Valley's giants in court — and they keep dodging - Politico

• • A federal judge declined to break up Google's ad-tech business despite antitrust violations.


• • The court opted for behavioral remedies rather than the structural divestiture sought by the Justice Department.


• • This ruling serves as a significant setback for the Trump administration's efforts to dismantle Big Tech monopolies.

Context
The case follows a 2025 ruling that found Google illegally monopolized segments of the online advertising market. The government attempted to force the sale of the AdX exchange to restore competition.

Christian Perspective
The refusal to dismantle these monopolies allows centralized power to remain in the hands of secular elites who often promote anti-Christian agendas. When massive corporations control the flow of information without accountability, they can effectively censor the truth and marginalize religious voices. True justice requires breaking the grip of these digital gatekeepers to ensure a free marketplace of ideas.

Implications
This decision preserves the dominance of a tech giant that frequently suppresses traditional values and promotes cultural degeneracy. It weakens the ability of the state to protect the citizenry from the unchecked influence of globalist corporations. Without structural changes, the digital landscape will continue to be shaped by those hostile to the American family and faith.

Broader Trends
This outcome reflects a pattern of the legal system protecting entrenched corporate interests against America First regulatory efforts. It demonstrates the resilience of the Silicon Valley establishment in dodging accountability through legal maneuvering. This struggle is part of a larger battle between national sovereignty and the power of transnational tech entities.

Takeaway
Americans must support strong leadership that is willing to use the full weight of the law to break up corrupt monopolies. We must prioritize the dismantling of these digital leviathans to protect our heritage and our freedom of speech. Protecting the nation requires reclaiming control from the technocratic class.