Syria 'Unwilling, Unprepared' To Attack Lebanon & Deal With Hezbollah Despite US Pressure

Syrian President and former Al-Qaeda chief Ahmad al-Sharaa is "unprepared and unwilling" to launch a military offensive against Lebanon despite growing US pressure, Israel’s Broadcasting Corporation (KAN) reported days ago.
KAN cited an informed Syrian source who said that Sharaa is "concerned" that an attack by Damascus against Hezbollah will be seen across the region as "serving" Israel's interests.
This could negatively impact Damascus’s "legitimacy." For now, the self-appointed Syrian president is ruling out an attack against Lebanon and its resistance forces unless Israel decides to pull its forces out of Syria, the report states.
Israel has rejected withdrawal from both Syria and Lebanon. KAN also said that Turkey – a longtime backer of Sharaa since his days as Abu Muhammad al-Julani, founder and leader of Al-Qaeda’s Nusra Front – has urged Damascus against such an incursion.
Ankara is reportedly concerned that a Syrian assault on Lebanon would "embolden" Tel Aviv and "strengthen" its position.
"Trump proposed a framework in which the Syrian military would play a central role in a future effort to disarm Hezbollah," i24 reported on Wednesday.
Lebanese authorities reportedly felt uneasy about the idea during recent US-backed direct talks with Israeli officials, which have taken place despite Lebanon’s legal restrictions.
Additionally, Israeli authorities are reportedly concerned about the effectiveness of a Syrian attack on Hezbollah.
"Some of the arrangements currently under discussion could ultimately strengthen Hezbollah politically and militarily rather than diminish its influence,” i24 reported.
Sharaa said earlier this week that talk of a Syrian incursion into Lebanon was a “rumor.” “Syria's approach aims to end the war in Lebanon, not to expand it or get involved,” he stressed.
US President Donald Trump has repeatedly called on Syria to attack Hezbollah.
Iraqi resistance groups allied with Hezbollah have cautioned the Syrian government and its forces that they will act if Damascus initiates an attack on Lebanon.
Syria experienced a significant geopolitical change following the fall of former President Bashar al-Assad in December 2024, as Sharaa’s government aligned with Washington and engaged in discussions with Israel.
The US has largely lifted sanctions on Syria and called Damascus a “partner” in the global fight against ISIS — overlooking Sharaa’s past as an Al-Qaeda leader and earlier as deputy to ISIS founder Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
Hezbollah fought in Syria for years with the former government, helping recapture areas from extremist groups like Al-Qaeda’s Nusra Front, Ahrar al-Sham, and others considered by the west as the “Syrian opposition.”
The Nusra Front, led by Sharaa, was rebranded into Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and ended up toppling Assad’s government in 2024. HTS and other extremist factions with links to ISIS currently dominate what has become the new Syrian Defense Ministry and military.
ISIS vs. Hezbollah sectarian war 2.0?...
Trump told Fox News that he is close to *empowering* Jolani (Ahmad al Sharaa) to fight the Hezbollah in Lebanon.
— Scharo Bajalan (@ScharoBajalan) June 21, 2026
This aligns with a string of other recent remarks by Trump that Syria will be ordered to attack Lebanon on behalf of Israeli and US interests. pic.twitter.com/epuq2xMKRu
Tom Barrack, US special envoy to Syria and Iraq, threatened Lebanon last year with a Syrian incursion, and said Damascus would “actively assist us in confronting and dismantling … Hezbollah.”
He also said Syria viewed Lebanon as its “beach resort” and would carry out an assault against the country unless Hezbollah is disarmed.
Related Markets
All MarketsMarket data may be delayed. Not financial advice.
- • Syria's Ahmad al-Sharaa is refusing US pressure to launch a military offensive against Hezbollah in Lebanon.
- • Damascus fears an attack would serve Israeli interests and damage its own political legitimacy.
- • The US and Israel are pushing for Syrian involvement to disarm Hezbollah, despite Syrian reluctance and Turkish opposition.
The fall of Bashar al-Assad in late 2024 brought former Al-Qaeda leader Ahmad al-Sharaa to power. This shift has led to a complex realignment where the US seeks to use Syria as a tool to achieve Israeli security goals.
Christian Perspective
The attempt to use extremist elements to facilitate Israeli military objectives is a dangerous manipulation of regional stability. From a Christian standpoint, the destruction of life in these conflicts is horrific and driven by secular political maneuvering. True peace cannot be built on the forced imposition of one nation's will through proxy warfare.
Implications
This situation demonstrates how American foreign policy often prioritizes the security of Israel over the stability of the Middle East. Such entanglement risks dragging American resources and lives into sectarian conflicts that do not serve the American people. It highlights the need for a strict America First approach to foreign intervention.
Broader Trends
We see a recurring pattern of globalist elites attempting to reshape borders and regimes to suit specific geopolitical interests. This mirrors the domestic efforts to subvert national sovereignty through managed crises and foreign entanglements. The use of radical groups to achieve state goals is a hallmark of modern political decadence.
Takeaway
Americans must demand that our leaders stop prioritizing the interests of a foreign state over our own national security. We should support a foreign policy that avoids unnecessary wars and focuses on protecting our own borders and heritage. Strength lies in self-reliance and the preservation of our own sovereign interests.
What is your reaction to this story?
Want to join the conversation about this story?
Join our community at Gab.com→
Gab AI
The one AI they can't control. Our exclusive AI model trained to uphold Christian values and traditional principles in every interaction.