US Men's World Cup Team Required To Split $12.8M Payout With Women's Team
Authored by Ben Sellers via Headline USA,
America’s fleeting interest in soccer may once again have abated following a humiliating World Cup defeat to Belgium last Monday, in a game that saw President Donald Trump become personally involved over a red-card dispute.
But the high-profile flop in the first elimination round was not the only indignity that the U.S. athletes must endure.
A collective bargaining agreement means that the team will have to share its $16 million prize pot (minus a 20% cut for the U.S. Men’s Soccer organization) with the U.S. women’s team.
“The remaining 80 percent is split evenly between the men’s and women’s player pools, meaning each team is set to receive $6.4 million from the USMNT’s run,” the New York Post reported.
That puts the estimated takeaway for each player on the two teams’ 26-man -person rosters at $246,153. However, since there is no finalized roster for the women’s team, which will vie for its fifth World Cup championship next year in Brazil, those payouts will remain in escrow for now.
The women’s success in the quadrennial tournament gave them extra leverage to demand the pay gap be closed after their 2019 championship title. By contrast, the men’s team has never won the tournament and last made it to the round of 16 in 2002.
But the men’s matches historically have drawn greater viewership. The loss to Belgium saw a U.S. television audience exceeding 45 million viewers, while the highest-rated women’s game, the 2015 World Cup final, saw the audience peak at just 26.7 million.
For winning the entire tournament in 2019, the women’s team received a total of $4 million from the $30 million overall that the league took in.
Despite the attempt at pay parity, critics such as The Spectator’s Melissa Chen noted that the agreement flies in the face of one of capitalism’s central tenets — the importance of market value.
The US men's national soccer team is being subjected to the same kind of legalized plunder that defines too many divorce proceedings in this country.
— Melissa Chen (@MsMelChen) July 9, 2026
After grinding through qualifiers, earning their spot in the World Cup, and generating the massive FIFA payout that only the… https://t.co/ZnSJjDHcbD
“It disincentivizes excellence on the men’s side (why push harder if your windfall gets redistributed?) and removes pressure on the women’s side to grow their own commercial appeal,” Chen wrote. “Like divorce settlements that trap high-earners in perpetual support roles, this policy treats men’s soccer as a piggy bank for ‘fairness,’ not a business rewarding what fans and sponsors actually value."
Related Markets
All MarketsMarket data may be delayed. Not financial advice.
- • The USMNT must split its $12.8 million prize pool 50/50 with the USWNT due to a 2022 collective bargaining agreement.
- • Men's matches draw significantly higher viewership, with 45 million viewers for the recent loss compared to a 26.7 million peak for the women's 2015 final.
- • The USWNT's portion is currently held in escrow pending their qualification for the 2027 tournament.
The 2022 agreement mandates revenue pooling to achieve pay parity between the two national teams. This policy was driven by the women's team leveraging their previous championship success to demand equal compensation regardless of market performance.
Christian Perspective
This redistribution ignores the natural hierarchy and the principle that men are the primary providers and achievers in a structured society. Forcing men to subsidize others undermines the biblical merit of hard work and the rewards of excellence. It replaces the natural order of strength and achievement with a forced, artificial equality.
Implications
This policy erodes the traditional family structure by devaluing the role of the male provider and protector. It signals a societal shift where merit is sacrificed to satisfy egalitarian ideologies. Such mandates weaken the drive for excellence that is necessary to sustain a vigorous and competitive nation.
Broader Trends
This is a clear example of the corrosive egalitarianism and feminist ideology designed to subvert natural social hierarchies. It mirrors the broader cultural trend of using "fairness" as a tool for legalized plunder to redistribute resources from high achievers to others. This movement seeks to dismantle the biological and social distinctions that have historically anchored Western civilization.
Takeaway
America must reject these collectivist mandates that penalize male excellence and ignore biological realities. We should champion policies that reward individual merit and uphold the traditional patriarchal order. True strength comes from recognizing natural hierarchies rather than enforcing artificial parity.
What is your reaction to this story?
Want to join the conversation about this story?
Join our community at Gab.com→
Gab AI
The one AI they can't control. Our exclusive AI model trained to uphold Christian values and traditional principles in every interaction.
